Closing the loop on battery recycling

Closing the loop on battery recycling
The number of lithium-ion batteries has skyrocketed. But what will happen to them after they die? Argonne’s ReCell model examines how much money and energy could be saved if we recycle these batteries. Credit: Shutterstock/Romaset

A novel model developed at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory allows industry, the Department and others to gauge the impact of recycling batteries in electric vehicles. It could further energize this market.

"Argonne has a long track record of expertise in battery research and development, and now we have added the ability to examine every step along the way, from manufacturing to ," said Argonne's Jeff Spangenberger, the project leader.

From cathodes to anodes and electrolytes, Argonne's understanding of batteries, combined with ReCell, a closed-loop battery recycling model, offers preliminary estimates of total costs as well as environmental impacts such as carbon dioxide emissions. The model breaks down each process from when a battery leaves the factory to when it is recycled.

Argonne's ReCell model can provide information to manufacturers up front, so those manufacturers can determine life cycle costs with precision and provide batteries to consumers with minimal environmental and economic impacts. Argonne's researchers have designed ReCell to be versatile and adapt to the challenges that recycling of lithium ion batteries present, such as differing battery chemistries and formats.

"ReCell helps determine where we need to focus our efforts. This results in more efficient research and expedites the process of reaching our life cycle, or circular, goal," said Spangenberger, who is also a recent recipient of a DOE Technology Commercialization Fund award.

The model includes three basic recycling technologies:

  • Extracting metals with heat (pyrometallurgical)
  • Extracting metals with liquids (hydrometallurgical)
  • Direct recycling
Credit: Argonne National Laboratory

Preliminary findings estimate that a cell with a recycled cathode could cost 5 percent, 20 percent and 30 percent less than a new cell using pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy and direct recycling routes, respectively, according to estimates from Argonne's Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model recycling parameters. That same cell could consume 10 percent, 20 percent and 30 percent less energy, respectively.

Additionally, the model considers transportation-related cost and environmental factors, which can help steer the development of a recycling infrastructure. For instance, is it more effective to have one large central recycling center or several smaller centers located throughout the country? Preliminary results from the ReCell model show how a simple change in shipping classification for end-of-life batteries could potentially change a recycled cathode's cost from 30 percent less than a new cathode to one that only breaks even.

Information provided by ReCell will become increasingly important as thousands of batteries from vehicles sold over the last decade reach their end of life, according to Spangenberger, who added that plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) sales in the U.S. more than doubled in the last four years. Currently, PEVs comprise only 1 percent of new vehicle sales. But by 2025, annual sales of PEVs will exceed 1.2 million vehicles, reaching more than 7 percent of annual vehicle sales.

The model, developed by Spangenberger and Qiang Dai, an Argonne postdoctoral fellow, also incorporates the work of Linda Gaines, a transportation systems analyst and battery recycling expert. This work, Gaines noted, could also help extend limited supplies of lithium, cobalt and other valuable elements. Ultimately, it could also reduce U.S. dependence on foreign resources and enhance national security.

ReCell leverages Argonne's patented GREET life-cycle model and Battery Performance and Cost, or BatPaC, a performance and cost for electric-drive vehicles.

GREET, developed by Michael Wang and his team, is a free program that allows users to analyze technologies over an entire life cycle—from well to wheels—and from raw material mining to disposal.

BatPaC, developed by Paul Nelson, is also a free program that captures the interplay between design and cost of lithium-ion batteries for transportation applications.

Explore further

Graphene unlocks the promise of lithium sulfur batteries

Citation: Closing the loop on battery recycling (2018, January 26) retrieved 20 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 26, 2018
New battery costs should come down 80% to make electric vehicles affordable. If it's just breaking even now, it's not yet cheap enough.

Jan 26, 2018
Give it a rest Eikka. You lost long ago.

Jan 26, 2018
When the maintenance and operating costs of the EV get realized it will be all over for the ICE.

But we will have significant social disruptions from this, as too much of our economy is tied to the ICE and its needs. Much cross-training will be required.

Jan 27, 2018
"Give it a rest Eikka. You lost long ago. "

Lost what? I still see no affordable electric car on the market.

The problem is that you can build a "cheap" electric car using battery chemistries that are fire hazards and short lived, such as NCA like what Tesla uses, or you can spend the worth of an entire mid-priced car on just the battery and then sell it for $100k, which means almost nobody can buy it.

Battery prices still have to come down by a very large margin, and if recycling them costs almost the same as what new batteries cost now - with a large (30%) component due to just collecting and handling them - then it's not economically possible to recycle the batteries.

Jan 27, 2018
Eikka shows us why California leads the world and not where he lives.

Jan 27, 2018
"Lost what?"

Your incessant defense of oil and coal. It's over. You're just fooling yourself now.

"using battery chemistries that are fire hazards and short lived"

You mean as opposed to oil and coal which are not fire hazards and are instantly used up and put as waste into the environment? How much more can you lose an argument?

"or you can spend the worth of an entire mid-priced car on just the battery"

The prices of batteries are dropping by 10% a year. The current battery vehicles are already cheaper (calculating total cost of owneship) over their lifetimes when compared to similar sized/performance ICEs. Sales sticker price isn't the only cost of a car, you know?
So by what measure are EVs worse, exactly? None.

Used batteries aren't waste. They can be used for grid storage (i.e. they have a substantial resale value) or, as the above article illustrates, recycled.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more