HCAI grand challenges. Credit: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2023). DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

A University of Central Florida professor and 26 other researchers have published a study identifying the challenges humans must overcome to ensure that artificial intelligence is reliable, safe, trustworthy and compatible with human values.

The study, "Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges," was published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.

Ozlem Garibay '01MS '08PhD, an assistant professor in UCF's Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, was the lead researcher for the study. She says that the technology has become more prominent in many aspects of our lives, but it also has brought about many challenges that must be studied.

For instance, the coming widespread integration of artificial intelligence could significantly impact human life in ways that are not yet fully understood, says Garibay, who works on AI applications in material and and discovery, and how AI impacts .

The six challenges Garibay and the team of researchers identified are:

  • Challenge 1, Human Well-Being: AI should be able to discover the implementation opportunities for it to benefit humans' well-being. It should also be considerate to support the user's well-being when interacting with AI.

  • Challenge 2, Responsible: Responsible AI refers to the concept of prioritizing human and societal well-being across the AI lifecycle. This ensures that the potential benefits of AI are leveraged in a manner that aligns with and priorities, while also mitigating the risk of unintended consequences or ethical breaches.

  • Challenge 3, Privacy: The collection, use and dissemination of data in AI systems should be carefully considered to ensure protection of individuals' privacy and prevent the harmful use against individuals or groups.

  • Challenge 4, Design: Human-centered design principles for AI systems should use a framework that can inform practitioners. This framework would distinguish between AI with extremely low risk, AI with no special measures needed, AI with extremely high risks, and AI that should not be allowed.

  • Challenge 5, Governance and Oversight: A governance framework that considers the entire AI lifecycle from conception to development to deployment is needed.

  • Challenge 6, Human-AI interaction: To foster an ethical and equitable relationship between humans and AI systems, it is imperative that interactions be predicated upon the fundamental principle of respecting the cognitive capacities of humans. Specifically, humans must maintain complete control over and responsibility for the behavior and outcomes of AI systems.

The study, which was conducted over 20 months, comprises the views of 26 international experts who have in AI technology.

"These challenges call for the creation of human-centered artificial intelligence technologies that prioritize ethicality, fairness and the enhancement of human well-being," Garibay says. "The challenges urge the adoption of a human-centered approach that includes responsible design, privacy protection, adherence to human-centered design principles, appropriate governance and oversight, and respectful interaction with human cognitive capacities."

Overall, these challenges are a call to action for the scientific community to develop and implement technologies that prioritize and benefit humanity, she says.

The group of 26 experts include National Academy of Engineering members and researchers from North America, Europe and Asia who have broad experiences across academia, industry and government. The group also has diverse educational backgrounds in areas ranging from computer science and engineering to psychology and medicine.

Their work also will be featured in a chapter in the book, Human-Computer Interaction: Foundations, Methods, Technologies, and Applications.

More information: Ozlem Ozmen Garibay et al, Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2023). DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320