This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



Report: UK net zero aviation ambitions must resolve resource and research questions around alternatives to jet fuel

UK net zero aviation ambitions must resolve resource and research questions around alternatives to jet fuel
Credit: Royal Society

Producing sustainable aviation fuel to supply the U.K.'s "net zero" ambitions would require enormous quantities of U.K. agricultural land or renewable electricity to keep flying at today's levels, a briefing by the U.K. science academy, the Royal Society, has warned.

The Net zero aviation fuels: resource requirements and environmental impacts report warns there is no single, clear, sustainable alternative to jet able to support flying on a scale equivalent to present day use.

The report explores these resource availability challenges, as well as likely costs, life-cycle impacts, infrastructure requirements and outstanding research questions across four fuel types, green hydrogen, biofuels (energy crops and waste), ammonia and synthetic fuels (efuels). (Note: Batteries were not considered as aircraft powered solely by batteries are not expected to reach the energy density requirements of long-distance commercial flight by 2050.)

It estimates that meeting existing U.K. aviation demand entirely with energy crops would require about half of U.K.'s . While producing sufficient green hydrogen fuel would require 2.4–3.4 times the U.K.'s 2020 renewable (wind and solar) electricity generation.

While each fuel type has advantages and drawbacks, the findings underscore the challenges of decarbonizing aviation, especially when resources are likely to be in global demand for a range of "net-zero" objectives.

The report also identifies significant research requirements in scaling up net zero fuels, from storage and handling, to environmental impacts including CO2 and non-CO2 emissions.

Addressing these challenges requires global coordination, particularly for navigating the transition period between current and future generation aircraft.

"Research and innovation are vital tools for the delivery of net zero," said Professor Graham Hutchings FRS, Regius Professor of Chemistry, Cardiff University, and chair of the report working group. "But we need to be very clear about the strengths, limitations, and challenges that must be addressed and overcome if we are to scale up the required new technologies in a few short decades.

"This briefing tries to pull together those realities, to allow to understand the future resource implications of today's policy and R&D decisions and to support international dialogue on this global technology transition."

Global aviation CO2 emissions were approximately 1,000 million metric tons per year in 2018/19, representing 2.4% of global emissions, dropping in 2020 to 600 million metric tons and increasing in 2021 to 720 million metric tons. U.K. aviation (international and domestic) accounted for 8% of U.K. greenhouse gas emissions in 2019.

The U.K. has committed to scale up manufacturing of sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and make domestic flying "net zero" by 2040, but aviation is growing globally, and is one of a number of sectors needing to decarbonize.

While alternative aviation fuels will likely have an increased cost, persisting with traditional kerosene is likely to become increasingly expensive as decarbonization in other sectors accelerates, the report notes.

Life cycle assessment

Life cycle assessment of the fuel options in the report considered their environmental impacts including emissions beyond CO2 from fuel production to pump, or fuel production to exhaust (known as wake). However, accounting for emissions and environmental impacts depends in part on the assumptions made and availability of data on their use and production.

Despite increasing investment in ammonia and hydrogen fuels, data on emissions are limited in the public domain—in part because of the immaturity of these technologies—so these projections will need to be continually updated as engine data from laboratory, and real-world testing develops.

Research will also be important to understand the impact of non-CO2 emissions from jet engines, and the formation of contrails, which currently contribute significantly to warming by globally. Alternative fuels may reduce these effects, but there are significant uncertainties over this.

Wider considerations, including the development of new airframes to permit hydrogen or ammonia storage, the refueling infrastructure, and safe refueling and storage protocols would also need to be investigated and adopted globally.

"How fossil fuel alternatives are produced is critical, as is how we measure their sustainability across the entire cycle of their use," Professor Marcelle McManus, Director of the Institute for Sustainability, University of Bath and a working group member.

"We need consistency, and we need to apply this globally, because adopting any of these new technologies will create demands and pressures for land, renewable energy or other products that may have knock on environmental or economic effects."

More information: Net zero aviation fuels: resource requirements and environmental impacts: … zero-aviation-fuels/

Provided by Royal Society
Citation: Report: UK net zero aviation ambitions must resolve resource and research questions around alternatives to jet fuel (2023, April 5) retrieved 22 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Report finds no single alternative to fossil-based jet fuel to support present demand


Feedback to editors