Poorly ventilated buildings are allowed under Australia rules. It's time to fix it
If COVID-19 had taught us anything it surely must be that poorly ventilated buildings can be a health hazard. Yet due to a weakness in current rules they continue to be built.
Under Australia's National Construction Code it is possible to build a nightclub for 1,000 people with no ventilation. And it is possible to build a school for 600 people with no ventilation, or an aged care center for 300 people with no ventilation.
This is because the Code requires windows that can be opened for natural ventilation, but nothing requires them to be opened in service.
And where the Code requires mechanical ventilation (fans or air conditioning) it is possible to build a hospital where the air that is supplied to patient rooms travels back to the air conditioning unit via corridors. A recent design in Footscray is typical.
This means that visitors, patients and health care workers have to travel through airborne effluent from unwell people to reach them.
Rules for water, few for air
The Code has rules for ensuring the purity of water delivered through plumbing, but no rules for ensuring the purity of air, or requirement to deliver a minimum standard of ventilation in buildings accessed by the public.
The handbook is a guide for practice that is meant to go beyond the bare bones of the Code.
The revisions include nothing that would ensure indoor air was free from particulates, carcinogenic gases such as nitrogen oxide and benzine, pathogens such as bacteria, mold and fungal spores, or viruses—such as COVID-19.
The Code and Handbook say buildings can be "deemed to satisfy" air quality requirements if they provide one of two things:
- "natural ventilation" using openable windows measuring 5% of the floor area
- "mechanical ventilation" complying with Australian Standard 1668.2
But no law or regulation prevents the construction of a naturally-ventilated building that can be operated with its windows shut.
In a home, opening and shutting windows is within the control of the occupant.
But in a publicly accessible building, occupants normally are unable to control windows, and in winter or summer they are often shut to control the temperature.
Airborne particles kill millions
Worldwide, pre-COVID, acute respiratory illnesses such as colds and influenza caused an estimated 18 billion upper airway infections and 340 million lower respiratory infections every year, resulting in more than 2.7 million deaths and economic losses in the billions.
One single airborne viral disease, COVID-19, has now claimed between 17 million and 25 million lives worldwide. Most transmission occurred indoors.
Good ventilation and high-efficiency particulate absorbing filtration could have prevented much of it.
This ought to be fixed at the top, with national indoor air quality standards that progressively apply to all buildings accessed by the public.
No parts-per-million standard
Ideally, the standards would include upper limits for all contaminants, down to and including a width of 2.5 microns.
These contaminants include bacteria, viruses, pollen and spores as well as particulates from bushfire smoke, vehicles and combustion processes.
Ventilation should also be sufficient to ensure that gaseous contaminants generated by building contents and indoor activities stay at safe levels.
Relatively inexpensive and reasonably accurate handheld devices are now available to measure contaminants and could be used to monitor compliance.
Schools ought to be the first priority.
Nearly all state and low-fee schools operate in buildings in which heating, ventilation and air conditioning is an overlay on a natural ventilation.
Usually, these systems just recirculate air, or worse, in the case of unflued gas heaters, pollute it. Teachers ought not to be placed in the position of having to choose between thermal comfort and good ventilation.
This should not mean windows are set so they are always open. It should mean the building is safe even if the windows are shut.
This will cost money, but the benefits to children are likely to outweigh the costs.
The revision of the Indoor Air Quality Handbook is an opportunity for the Building Codes Board to start reforming the code so it takes health into proper account, rather than continuing to kick the can down the road.