Improved efficiency of all-polymer solar cells

Fill me up: Improved efficiency of all-polymer solar cells
The high FFs (~70%) of the all-polymer blend solar cells were achieved because of the longer charge-carrier lifetimes due to the lower bimolecular charge recombination coefficients. The preferred blend morphology for suppressing the bimolecular charge recombination is characterized by a well-ordered local structure due to chain aggregation by both the polymer donor (D) and acceptor (A). Credit: Hiroaki Benten

Solar cells are an important contributor to a renewable energy supply, but solar panel waste will quickly become an enormous problem. Now, in a study recently published in Journal of Materials Chemistry A, researchers from Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST) have investigated the science that might help improve the utility of easily mass-producible, all-polymer-based solar cells.

Globally, approximately one-third of electricity currently comes from renewable sources. Silicon-based solar cells are the major contributor, but there's an increasing problem: what to do with the panels after their 30-year lifetime. A May 2022 article in Chemical & Engineering News lays out the problem: even when facilities recycle the frames and covers of the panels, the most valuable or even toxic elements are simply disposed. With a forecasted 80 million metric tons of solar panel waste to have been produced by 2050, this is a massive waste problem.

Polymer-based solar cells are a possible, less-wasteful solution. Such panels are thin and flexible, and thus are in principle quite versatile. Nevertheless, they have certain problems; e.g., a lower power conversion efficiency than silicon. "This efficiency is substantially limited by the fill factors: commonly less than 60%, even in advanced devices," says corresponding author Hiroaki Benten of Nara Institute of Science and Technology. "The science that underpins the limited efficiency of all- blend solar cells remains insufficiently unexplored."

A ground-breaking result of this research is the high fill factor: 70%, which remained 60% even for several hundred nanometers thick. Competing polymer technology exhibits a 40% fill factor at this thickness. This is because bimolecular recombination of free electrons with free holes substantially inhibited the fill factor prior work, but was suppressed in the current study.

What suppressed bimolecular recombination within the polymer blends? "There was substantial charge delocalization in the donor and acceptor domains," explains Masakazu Nakamura, senior author. "Appropriate aggregation of the polymer donors and acceptors led to a substantially ordered local structure of the polymer, which helped keep the separation of the electrons from the holes."

Even if researchers completely solve the efficiency problem of all-polymer solar cells, they'll still need to improve on the 10-year service life of the most advanced research prototypes. Additional research efforts include optimizing the film morphology, and even developing hybrid polymer/silicon solar cells, to optimize energy collection and efficiency. In the coming years, might look and function completely different from—and better than—modern technology.

More information: Ren Hagio et al, Chain aggregation dictates bimolecular charge recombination and fill factor of all-polymer blend solar cells, Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2022). DOI: 10.1039/D2TA04705E
Journal information: Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Provided by Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Citation: Improved efficiency of all-polymer solar cells (2022, October 3) retrieved 30 November 2022 from https://techxplore.com/news/2022-10-efficiency-all-polymer-solar-cells.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Illuminating how solvent additives improve efficiency in polymer solar cells

47 shares

Feedback to editors