This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Why you don't want 'phantom energy' on a spacecraft

Why you don't want 'phantom energy' on a spacecraft
Credit: AI-generated image (disclaimer)

You may not have heard of piezoelectric materials, but odds are, you have benefitted from them.

Piezoelectric materials are —like crystals, bone or proteins—that produce an electric current when they are placed under mechanical stress.

Materials that harvest energy from their surroundings (through light, heat and motion) are finding their way into solar cells, wearable and implantable electronics and even onto spacecraft. They let us keep devices charged for longer, maybe even forever, without the need to connect them to a power supply.

But for these energy harvesters to work effectively, we must know exactly how much energy they can produce.

Now, for the first time, using a simple signal processing technique, our team has shown that used to benchmark piezoelectric materials include electro-static (or phantom) energy.

Our research, published in the journal Nano Energy, found that more electricity is produced than we expected—particularly when we harvest energy from motion.

This extra or "phantom" energy needs to be factored in when designing the next-generation of advanced electronics and, until recently, there was no way to tell how much phantom energy (if any at all) was present in motion-based energy harvesters.

Our research team has discovered a simple way to identify if this phantom energy is present—just by looking at the electrical signal produced by a material exposed to motion.

Measuring phantom energy

Piezoelectric materials have been used for energy harvesting and sensing for several decades.

Their application ranges from very simple, contact-based energy harvesters to complex networks of industrial vibration sensors, pacemakers, structural health monitoring devices and micro-thrusters in space satellites.

Conventional, motion-based energy harvesters utilize one or more energy conversion principles, like (e.g., wind turbines), electrostatic induction (e.g., Van Der Graaff generators) and piezoelectricity.

Recent advancements in materials science have accelerated the design and development of functional materials that rely on the phenomenon of piezoelectricity.

Piezoelectricity converts mechanical energy through deformation to (voltage). For example, polymers that are quite flexible can undergo temporary physical changes, like bending or twisting, before returning to their former shape.

This, in turn, causes the internal polymer chains to move which, in certain polymers, results in an electrical production.

The ability of these materials to continuously produce an electrical output with minimal effort has interested researchers and manufacturers from many fields.

These days, piezoelectric materials (particularly polymers) are widely used as wearable devices (like smart shoes, watches or gloves) to convert motion into electrical energy that can be stored and used.

However, the friction from causing the piezoelectric material to produce an electrical output can result in electrostatic charges accumulating on the material's surface.

Static electricity is something many of us have experienced—getting electric shocks after walking in socks on carpet or watching lightning bolts during a thunderstorm.

This is called the "triboelectric" effect, which can occur when any two materials contact each other. In practical applications, like harvesting energy from movement, understanding these additional effects introduced by friction is essential to avoid exposing the intricate electronic devices to an unexpected upsurge in energy yields.

Unfortunately, it's extremely challenging to distinguish between intrinsic piezoelectric signals and triboelectricity-hindered signals. This is primarily due to the similarities between piezoelectricity and the enigmatic triboelectric signals.

So, we shielded energy harvesters, wrapping the equipment in conductive adhesive like carbon tape to identify if the measurements from were accurate.

We found that signals from shielded energy harvesters (with no triboelectric interference) had a unique frequency response, compared to the signals from unshielded energy harvesters.

Finding phantom energy

We found that by simply taking the from an energy harvester and converting it to the frequency domain, using a common signal processing technique called the fast Fourier transform, it becomes immediately apparent that phantom energy is present in the measurements.

This technique can be used by very simple mathematical software like MATLAB.

The fast Fourier transform takes an analogue signal, like voltage over time, and converts it to the frequency domain—to see how much and how frequently there is repetition within that same signal.

Motion-based energy harvesting is a relatively simple process, so you expect to see a simple frequency spectrum. Think of this spectrum like a single skyscraper. However, when the research team intentionally added phantom energy, this frequency spectrum now looked like an entire city skyline.

These so-called harmonic induced distortions can be singled out as phantom energy interferences that, in most cases, amplify the source signal.

By knowing how to look for phantom energy, engineers can be confident that any energy harvesting materials, perhaps those in outer space or implanted in the body, will produce the exact amount of energy they need to—no more, no less.

Removing phantom energy

The Fourier transform method is regularly used in data analysis to find trends and anomalies within signals and we can use this tool to identify interferences in our piezoelectric measurements.

There are many small locations on the energy harvesting devices where friction occurs during testing—and these small locations can make a massive difference to the output.

For example, they could take an expected output of 1 volt (V) to 10 V or even 50 V during benchmark testing.

While this may seem like a good thing, all this extra energy will not be harvested. The unexpected spike in power is like a fuse blowing during a lightning strike and the device would not be able to cope with the extra energy.

Not something you want in outer space or inside your body.

We tested piezoelectric samples in a variety of ways and showed, using our simple, fast Fourier transform technique, how phantom energy could be identified during benchmarking.

Identifying and measuring phantom energy means researchers can use simple signal filters to isolate and eliminate any interference.

Manufacturers of piezoelectric can apply it during construction—confidently creating devices made for bionics, spacecraft or any other precision application—and produce the exact amount of energy they need to improve the lifetime of a device. Maybe forever piezo-lifetimes.

More information: Ronald T. Leon et al, Decoupling piezoelectric and triboelectric signals from PENGs using the fast fourier transform, Nano Energy (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108445

Journal information: Nano Energy
Citation: Why you don't want 'phantom energy' on a spacecraft (2023, May 8) retrieved 16 July 2024 from https://techxplore.com/news/2023-05-dont-phantom-energy-spacecraft.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

High-performance and compact vibration energy harvester created for self-charging wearable devices

523 shares

Feedback to editors