This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


Trading between households in smart energy communities

Trading between households in smart energy communities: the more the merrier?
Graphical abstract. Credit: Applied Energy (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122173

Our energy systems are undergoing rapid change. Many households are generating electricity with solar panels, and there are new sources of demand and storage, such as charging electric vehicles and home batteries. Local prosumers (energy consumers who also generate and store energy) are taking control of their own energy supply. This development is prompting the creation of energy communities and micro-grids, such as the SchoonSchip community in the north of Amsterdam.

Energy communities allow consumers to generate, use and trade energy locally. In this way, they are no longer dependent on large energy suppliers. By bringing closer to where it is needed, these communities also help to alleviate grid congestion, which is a growing challenge for grid operators.

Unanswered questions

There are two main models for energy communities. In the first, prosumers individually control their own energy resources and then trade with each other. In the other model, multiple prosumers share and jointly control energy resources, such as , or community-owned batteries. In both models, distributed AI techniques are often used to automate and optimize peer-to-peer (P2P) exchanges.

Yet these models raise many unanswered questions: how do you honestly share the costs and benefits of generating energy from shared assets? Other important questions are: how many prosumers need to be involved to make P2P trading economically viable, and what are the various reasons for people with different energy consumption needs to participate in such projects?

Large-scale real data

A study, published in Applied Energy, aims to shed light on some of these key questions. The researchers used large-scale real data from the UK.

Co-author Valentin Robu, a researcher at CWI and TU Eindhoven, explains, "The focus of our study was on the marginal benefits of peer-to-peer energy exchange contracts, using a method of measurement known as 'Gains from Trade.' We found that as the number of peer-to-peer energy contracts increases and more prosumers enter the market, diversity in consumption profiles quickly decreases, leading to significantly diminishing returns."

"This means that most of the Gains from Trade from an energy community can be achieved if only a fraction of the community members participate. Especially those members with the most different demand profiles from other community members."

"Our study also explores how an AI technique called multi-agent systems can be used to automate and optimize P2P negotiations so that both parties benefit from the energy exchange."

The study was the result of a collaboration between researchers at CWI (the National Research Institute for Mathematics & Computer Science in Amsterdam), Delft University of Technology & Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands, together with researchers at University of Glasgow (UK) and Princeton University (U.S.). It was part of the Marie Curie TESTBED-2 project.

More information: Ying Zhang et al, Modelling the formation of peer-to-peer trading coalitions and prosumer participation incentives in transactive energy communities, Applied Energy (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122173

Citation: Trading between households in smart energy communities (2024, February 1) retrieved 13 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Artificial intelligence enables smart control and fair sharing of resources in energy communities


Feedback to editors