This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Clearing the air: Wind farms more land efficient than previously thought

Wind power
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Wind power is a source of energy that is both affordable and renewable. However, decision-makers have been reluctant to invest in wind energy due to a perception that wind farms require a lot of land compared to electric power plants driven by fossil fuels. Research led by McGill University and based on the assessment of the land use of close to 320 wind farms in the U.S. (the largest study of its kind) paints a very different picture.

The study, which was published recently in Environmental Science & Technology, shows that, when calculations are made, the entire wind farm area is usually considered as land given over to wind development. However, the infrastructure (such as the turbines and roads) typically only uses 5 percent of the entire farmland—the rest is often used for other purposes, such as agriculture.

The research also shows that if wind turbines are sited in areas with existing roads and infrastructure, such as on , they can be approximately seven times more efficient in terms of energy produced per square meter of land directly impacted by the infrastructure, than projects that are developed from scratch.

"The land use of wind farms has often been viewed as among the predominant challenges to wind development," explains Sarah Jordaan, an associate professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at McGill and the senior author of the study.

"But, by quantifying the land area used by nearly 16,000 in the western U.S., we found that gas-fired generation offers no real benefits in terms of lesser land use when the infrastructures, including all the wells, pipelines, and roads associated with the natural gas supply chain, are considered."

A new approach to future energy technology assessments

It has been difficult to get a clear picture of the land use associated with wind power in the U.S. until now because earlier studies only looked at the infrastructure associated with and land use on a relatively small scale, making it difficult to extrapolate from their results. Other studies have relied on estimates of the entire wind farm rather than the land directly impacted by the infrastructure.

By combining information gathered through GIS () with machine learning models developed using nearly 2000 images of wind farms from the American portion of the Western Interconnection (which provides electricity to 14 states in the U.S. as well as to portions of Canada and Mexico), the researchers were able to train a deep learning model to analyze land use in .

By doing so, they were able to assess a range of factors (placement of turbines, pre-existing roads, age of turbines, etc.) that contribute to the land directly impacted by wind infrastructure.

"The method we have developed is potentially useable for future assessments of various energy technologies, whether in terms of environmental impact analysis or energy systems planning for net zero emissions," adds Jordaan. "In fact, it sets the stage for the first consistent comparisons of environmental sustainability across different energy technologies in the future."

More information: Tao Dai et al, Land Resources for Wind Energy Development Requires Regionalized Characterizations, Environmental Science & Technology (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07908

Provided by McGill University
Citation: Clearing the air: Wind farms more land efficient than previously thought (2024, April 17) retrieved 27 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Powerful answers to energy questions may be blowing in the wind


Feedback to editors