India chides Twitter for not complying with blocking orders

India chides Twitter for not complying with blocking orders
A man reads tweets by Indian celebrities, one of the many backing the Indian government, on his mobile in New Delhi, India, Thursday, Feb. 4, 2021. It took just one tweet from pop star Rihanna to anger the Indian government and supporters of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party, after she tweeted about the farmer protests that have gripped India. Critics say the government has used the massive demonstrations to escalate a crackdown on free speech, detaining journalists and freezing Twitter accounts. Hundreds of Indian Twitter accounts, including those of news websites, activists and a farmers' union, were suspended on Monday. (AP Photo/Manish Swarup)

India has chided Twitter for not complying with its orders to remove certain accounts and content, warning the social media platform that it "must respect" Indian laws "irrespective of Twitter's own rules and guidelines."

"We value freedom and we value criticism because it is part of our democracy. But freedom of expression is not absolute and it is subject to reasonable restrictions" as mentioned in the constitution, India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology said in a statement late Wednesday.

Twitter has found itself in a standoff with the government after it refused to fully comply with last week's government order to remove some accounts, including those of , journalists, activists and politicians, citing its "principles of defending protected speech and freedom of expression."

The government said the accounts—unspecified in number—were using provocative hashtags to spread misinformation about the massive farmer protests that have rattled Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration.

Twitter responded by temporarily blocking some of those accounts. It, however, refused to outright suspend them as suggested by the government and imposed restrictions on them only within India. Twitter subsequently restored them after online outrage.

Critics have accused the government of using the protests to escalate a crackdown on free speech aimed at muzzling opposition.

Twitter's actions appeared to irk Modi's government, which over the years has sought to tighten its grip over , particularly Twitter and Facebook. The government served Twitter a non-compliance notice and threatened its officials with a fine and imprisonment of up to seven years for violating the order.

The ministry in its statement said it was disappointed after Twitter "unwillingly, grudgingly and with great delay" complied with only parts of the government's orders.

It cited Twitter's crackdown on accounts after last month's Capitol Hill insurrection in the United States, calling it a "differential treatment" to India. It said what happened in Washington was comparable to the violence at India's Red Fort on Jan. 26 when a group of protesting farmers stormed New Delhi's 17th century monument. Hundreds of police and farmers were injured in clashes and one protester died.

Twitter did not immediately comment on the ministry's statement.

Leaders from Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party also attacked Twitter for what they said was a refusal to abide by Indian laws.

On Thursday, Information Technology Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad named Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn in Parliament and said they will have to follow the Indian constitution. He warned the social media websites of "strict action" if they were "misused to spread fake news and fuel violence."

The clampdown on Twitter accounts comes as thousands of farmers have camped outside the capital for months to protest new agricultural laws they say will devastate their earnings. The says the laws will boost production through private investment.

© 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Citation: India chides Twitter for not complying with blocking orders (2021, February 11) retrieved 15 July 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Social media bans, restrictions have mixed impact on potential misinformation following Capitol riot


Feedback to editors