Recycling – A batteries passport

Recycling – A batteries passport
The proposed Battery Identity Global Passport suggests a scannable QR code or other digital tag affixed to Li-ion batteries to identify materials for efficient end-of-life recycling. Credit: Andy Sproles, ORNL/U.S. Dept. of Energy

Scientists at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have devised a method to identify the unique chemical makeup of every lithium-ion battery around the world, information that could accelerate recycling, recover critical materials and resolve a growing waste stream.

Similar to how plastics are stamped with a recycling code identifying their makeup, Li-ion batteries could be encoded with what ORNL researchers described as a Battery Identity Global Passport, which could be accessible as a scannable QR code or a computer chip. This method could help recyclers more efficiently locate in-demand materials and accommodate the wide variety of designs used to manufacture Li-ion batteries.

"This passport can help recyclers contend with the mixed stream of materials since there's no standard cell chemistry now for Li-ion battery production," said ORNL's Ilias Belharouak. "The challenge is growing as we see more of these batteries used in electric vehicles, for energy storage and in electronic devices."

More information: Yaocai Bai et al. Energy and environmental aspects in recycling lithium-ion batteries: Concept of Battery Identity Global Passport, Materials Today (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.001

Journal information: Materials Today
Citation: Recycling – A batteries passport (2021, April 5) retrieved 19 April 2024 from https://techxplore.com/news/2021-04-recycling-batteries-passport.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New class of cobalt-free cathodes could enhance energy density of next-gen lithium-ion batteries

23 shares

Feedback to editors