This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



Why Europe needs a circular approach to critical raw materials

recycling logo
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

CLG Europe's Materials & Products Taskforce has released a new report in partnership with the Wuppertal Institute on the urgent need for more circularity in the EU critical raw materials market. The report, "Embracing circularity: A pathway for strengthening the Critical Raw Materials Act," is a direct response to the EU's Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), which was published in March 2023.

Authors of the report claim circularity is far more than just recycling—it also involves looking at how to keep materials in the system more effectively and for longer. The report maintains that this aspect of circularity is not sufficiently addressed by the current CRMA proposal.

Centered around three key materials—aluminum (bauxite and magnesium), lithium, and (REE), the report builds on evidence-based research. It includes circular case studies from businesses such as Ball and Volvo Cars and provides recommendations to policymakers.

Eliot Whittington, Chief Systems Change Officer, CISL said, "Global competition is heating up around key materials and the climate is heating up in response to our , but by adopting a more circular economy Europe can turbocharge its response to both challenges in one go. As the EU negotiates its Critical Raw Materials Act, it should seize the opportunity to scale up circularity.

"European policymakers should look to learn from how leading businesses across sectors are already implementing a wide range of circular economy solutions in critical raw materials use, and facilitate the finance flows and flexible, targeted policies needed to take these approaches to scale—accelerating the EU's journey to climate neutrality and strategic autonomy."

Raw materials play a crucial role in the green transition, in the manufacturing of solar panels, wind turbines and electric cars. As a result, demand in the EU is set to soar over the coming years—lithium demand in particular is expected to be 12 times higher in the EU by 2030 and, globally, 90 times higher by 2050. But with 24 of the materials listed in the CRMA imported from China, plus the environmental damage and the societal impact of more domestic mines in Europe, the importance of the EU's strategic autonomy has come into sharper focus.

The report suggests a circular economy in the EU would help to increase security of supply for critical raw materials. Circular practices require a more deliberate shift towards a reuse model, which could play a key role in managing supply.

Prof. Dr. Manfred Fischedick, President and Scientific Managing Director of the Wuppertal Institute, said, "Russia's war on Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted Europe's high vulnerability—especially in the supply of raw materials, which today is largely import-based. In principle, the EU has the potential to become more independent. However, this would entail higher raw material prices, and mining activities inevitably encroach on nature and landscapes.

"Circular economy is the better alternative. It can help provide needed materials efficiently and keep extraction of primary raw materials to a minimum. If policymakers set a clear framework for this, it can be the basis for high security of supply and a greener and socially responsible economy."

The report showcases the challenges, opportunities and business of embracing more circular practices in CRM use, using from members of the Materials & Products Taskforce and other identified company stakeholders along the value chains of lithium, aluminum and REE. From materials technology company Umicore, who have developed battery recycling technology and have capacity for 7,000 metric tons per year, to aluminum packaging giant Ball's target to achieve 90% recycling and an 85% recycled content target by 2030.

The report's recommendations to policy-makers include how to:

  • Implement a more comprehensive circular approach within the CRMA, rather than focusing only on recycling.
  • Set a towards circularity within the CRMA that recognizes the need for a case-by-case approach.
  • Deploy forward-looking infrastructure to enable a systems-wide .
  • Set a clear overall vision on a European Industrial Strategy that combines circularity, carbon neutrality and further sustainability aspects.
  • Create more environmentally and socially sustainable supply chains by diversifying supply chains and promoting responsible mining practices.
  • Implement financial incentives and support schemes to ensure faster the commercial viability of a shift towards green technologies.

More information: Embracing circularity: A pathway for strengthening the Critical Raw Materials Act. … gsVI4z9NDkDUZe8/view

Provided by Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH
Citation: Why Europe needs a circular approach to critical raw materials (2023, July 17) retrieved 3 March 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Report: Dutch urban mine is full of resources, but a circular economy is still too ambitious


Feedback to editors