Want to save carbon and land? Study suggests wooden cities

Wood is known to be the least carbon-intensive building material
Wood is known to be the least carbon-intensive building material.

Housing people in homes made from wood instead of steel and concrete could save more than 100 billion metric tons of carbon emissions while preserving enough cropland to feed a booming population, research suggested Tuesday.

More than half of people globally currently live in cities and this proportion is set to rise markedly by 2050.

According to some estimates, the infrastructure needed to accommodate up to 10 billion people by mid-century could exceed that constructed since the dawn of the industrial era.

That places a huge emphasis on emissions from construction, one of the most polluting sectors and historically one of the trickiest to decarbonize.

Were all new construction projects carried out using steel and concrete, that could claim up to 60 percent of Earth's remaining for 2C of warming—that is, how much pollution the can produce and still stay within the Paris Agreement temperature guardrail.

Scientists in Germany and Taiwan wanted to see how much could be saved if firms switched to to build new homes instead.

They used an open-source land use model to simulate four different building scenarios: one with like cement and steel, and three with additional demand for timber.

They also analyzed how additional high wood demand could be satisfied, where it could be produced, and the impacts new tree plantations might have on biodiversity and crop production.

They found that housing people in timber homes could avoid more than 100 billion tons of CO2 by 2100—that's around 10 percent of the remaining 2C carbon budget, equivalent to nearly three years of global emissions.

Wood is known to be the least carbon-intensive building material as trees absorb CO2 as they grow, explained the study lead author Abhijeet Mishra, from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).

"Production of engineered wood releases much less CO2 than production of steel and cement," he said. "Engineered wood also stores carbon, making timber cities a unique long-term carbon sink."

He said that engineered wood was the ideal material for constructing "mid-rise" buildings—between four and 12 stories—to house growing .

The study, published in the journal Nature Communications, found that around 140 million hectares—an area larger than Peru—would be needed to grow new trees to meet the increased demand under the timber-led building scenario.

But the team calculated that these new plantations could be established on existing areas of harvest forest, and so not impact by eating into crop land.

"We need farm land to grow food for the people –- using it to grow trees could potentially cause competition for the limited land resources," said co-author Florian Humpenoder, from PIK.

The authors concluded that planting the necessary additional plantations was possible but would require "strong governance and careful planning" from governments in order to limit their impact on biodiversity.

More information: Abhijeet Mishra, Land use change and carbon emissions of a transformation to timber cities, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32244-w. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32244-w
Journal information: Nature Communications

© 2022 AFP

Citation: Want to save carbon and land? Study suggests wooden cities (2022, August 30) retrieved 5 December 2022 from https://techxplore.com/news/2022-08-carbon-wooden-cities.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Living in timber cities could avoid emissions, without using farmland for wood production

10 shares

Feedback to editors