This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication


Comparing the neural activity differences between human-produced and NLP-produced language

Reveals the implicit perception in distinguishing human and NLP-produced language natural language processing (NLP)
Whole-brain analysis and overlap analysis results. Credit: Wei et al

Natural Language Processing (NLP) refers to the technology that enables machines to interact and communicate with humans through natural language used in humans' daily communication. This technology allows computers to express given intention and thoughts through natural language generation.

In a study published in Advanced Science, Prof. Zhang Xiaochu and his team from the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) demonstrated the crucial role of implicit neural information in perception and comprehension by comparing the differences between human-produced and NLP-produced language. This study also provides promising ideas for evaluating the quality of natural language generation.

The NLP research community has long sought to generate language matching the quality of human-produced language. Despite the tremendous progress made in this field, evaluating the quality of NLP-produced language still poses significant challenges. Studies in the psychology of language suggest that language contains rich social and psychological information about the speaker, mainly processed by readers or listeners on an implicit level. Therefore, adding implicit perception information into the quality evaluation criteria of generation is a promising potential direction.

In this study, Prof. Zhang's team collected the corpus of chatbots Google Meena and Microsoft XiaoIce as representatives of NLP-produced languages and human corpus as control materials. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology was used to record the participants' neural signals as they browsed and evaluated the two corpora.

The analysis of the results found that when participants subjectively judged that the human corpus and the robot corpus were both human-like, the activation levels of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the right temporoparietal junction area, which are the core areas of the brain's mentalizing network, can still significantly distinguish the source of the corpus. Neural activity evoked by corpus from different sources and with different judgments showed remarkable similarities across subjects.

The study found that the significantly activated overlapped with the mentalizing network of meta-analysis neuro-synthesis, indicating that the brain regions involved in the implicit perception while distinguishing between human-produced and NLP-produced language were indeed the mentalizing network.

These findings suggest that the brain's implicit sensory neural signals are more sensitive to evaluative information than self-reports. Incorporating such information into evaluation criteria can help develop NLP technology. This study also provides a new perspective for developing a new Turing test to measure the level of artificial intelligence.

More information: Zhengde Wei et al, Implicit Perception of Differences between NLP‐Produced and Human‐Produced Language in the Mentalizing Network, Advanced Science (2023). DOI: 10.1002/advs.202203990

Journal information: Advanced Science
Provided by University of Science and Technology of China
Citation: Comparing the neural activity differences between human-produced and NLP-produced language (2023, March 23) retrieved 15 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Corpus callosum found to switch off right hemisphere during speech


Feedback to editors