This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Right-wing social media benefited from high-profile suspensions on mainstream platforms, says study

Right-wing social media benefited from high-profile suspensions on mainstream platforms
User registrations and daily activity for each cohort - English-speaking cohort. (a) 3-day moving average of the daily number of users who registered on Gettr. The curve is displayed separately for the banned cohort (blue), the matched cohort (green) and other users who are not-verified on Gettr (orange). (b) 7-day moving average of the proportion of users from each cohort who were active on Gettr on a given day. The percentage of the matched cohort active on Twitter is also shown (dashed brown). Only English-speaking users are considered for this analysis. Credit: PNAS Nexus (2023). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad346

Following the ban of prominent political figures from Twitter, such as former US President Donald Trump, many alt-tech platforms—offering uncensored speech and popular with the far-right—have gained significant influence across the digital media ecosystem.

In a new paper published in PNAS Nexus, researchers from City, University of London studied user engagement on Gettr, a Twitter-like platform that attracted right-wing 'celebrities' such as Steve Bannon, Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson.

The study finds that alt-tech platforms are increasingly important for facilitating far-right political discussions, and that the success of these platforms can be explained by their dependence on influential figureheads.

For example, following Twitter's suspension of Robert Malone (a US scientist spreading anti-vaccine content), podcaster Joe Rogan's endorsement on Gettr led to a spike in user registrations. However, these migrations can be short-lived. The study shows that many of these users left Gettr when Joe Rogan later criticized the .

But returning to the mainstream is not an option for users banned from Twitter. The academics found that users were up to six times more active on Gettr than those users who retained their Twitter use. For those users active on both platforms, the study showed that their content is more toxic on Twitter than it is on Gettr, and that they often share content from news media outlets that broadly align with the far-right, such as Breitbart News.

On Twitter, these users actively target toxic messages at —mainly Democrats, but also Republican outliers such as Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. Both were recently called "traitors to the Republican Party" by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene, an active Gettr user, due to their criticism of Trump's involvement in the January 6th US Capitol insurrection.

Importantly, the study looked at data up until January 2023, before Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter. Since then, the study estimates that approximately one third of the users who had been banned from Twitter prior to the takeover are now once again active on the rebranded "X." This raises the risk that the political opponents of these far-right social media users may receive increased toxic abuse in the future.

Amin Mekacher, the study's lead author, said, "We have seen a sudden growth of the alt-tech ecosystem in recent years. Several of these platforms have been accused of driving radicalization, leading to violent uprisings, as displayed by Gettr's involvement in the Brasilia insurrection in January 2023. Currently, these online spaces are scarcely monitored and we therefore risk missing telltale signs of collective radicalization."

The project is part of the IRIS Academic Research Group, an international coalition of academics from City, University of London and leading institutions including Harvard University, University of Cambridge, and others.

Professor Andrea Baronchelli, IRIS lead at City and senior author of the paper, said, "Even today, many people consider banning users from platforms like Facebook or Twitter as a way of silencing them. However, this no longer holds true. We are seeing a new era where alternative platforms are thriving and benefiting from those ousted by the mainstream.

"To address misinformation and radicalization, a systemic approach that considers the entire ecosystem is needed, and innovative policies should be devised accordingly."

More information: Amin Mekacher et al, The systemic impact of deplatforming on social media, PNAS Nexus (2023). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad346

Journal information: PNAS Nexus
Citation: Right-wing social media benefited from high-profile suspensions on mainstream platforms, says study (2023, October 26) retrieved 16 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Nearly 50% of environmentalists abandoned Twitter following Musk's takeover


Feedback to editors